310-975-7040 justice@kgzlaw.omdevops.com
Kravis, Graham & Zucker, LLP
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Writ of Habeas Corpus
    • Re-Sentencing
    • Parole Suitability Hearing
    • Certification of Rehabilitation
    • Prisoners Rights
    • Proposition 47
    • Proposition 57
    • SB 260
    • SB 261
    • SB 1437
  • Notable Cases
  • Attorneys
    • Randy Kravis
    • Ian Graham
    • Bruce Zucker
    • Maya Emig
  • About
  • Contact
Select Page
Should an accomplice to a killing be charged with murder?

Should an accomplice to a killing be charged with murder?

by openmedium | May 1, 2019 | News, Resentencing

SOURCE: The Mercury News AUTHOR: By NICO SAVIDGE | Bay Area News Group PUBLISHED: April 24, 2019 at 6:00 am | UPDATED: April 24, 2019 at 3:14 pm Armando Carranza, convicted of a murder he didn’t commit, might have thought he’d be out of prison by now. As of Jan. 1, a...

Recent Posts

  • Los Angeles County New Resentencing Eligibility Rules
  • Should an accomplice to a killing be charged with murder?
  • San Francisco will remove marijuana-related crimes from records

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • December 2020
    • May 2019
    • February 2019

    Categories

    • Expungement's
    • News
    • Resentencing

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Notable Cases

    Watson v. California
    The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on a petition arguing that the defendant’s sentence was illegal because the judge, not a jury, found facts that elevated the sentence.

    Naya v. California
    The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on a petition arguing that the defendant’s sentence was illegal because the judge, not a jury, found facts that elevated the sentence.

    People v. Alvarado
    Several serious felony convictions ordered reversed by the Fifth District Court of Appeal on grounds that the charges were improperly amended during the trial.

    Unites States v. Davis, 428 F.3d 802 (9th Cir. 2005)
    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered the guilty plea of the defendant vacated on grounds that he received ineffective assistance of counsel from his trial attorney.

    Campos v. Stone
    A federal judge in the Northern District of California granted the defendant’s federal habeas corpus petition and ordered the conviction vacated on the ground that his admissions made during a police interrogation were coerced.

    People v. Diaz
    The Fifth District Court of Appeal fully reversed the defendant’s convictions on the ground that his waiver of a jury trial was invalid because it was not knowingly and intelligently made.

    People v. Flynn
    The Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed several sex offenses on the ground that the defendant was improperly denied the right to present certain evidence at trial,.

    People v. Woren
    The appellate division of the Los Angeles Superior Court reversed most of the convictions on the ground that the record on appeal was not sufficiently preserved denying the defendant meaningful appellate review of his case.

    People v. Valle
    The Second District Court of Appeal fully reversed the defendant’s convictions on the ground that the judge improperly told the jurors what a preliminary hearing is. The Court of Appeal agreed with Mr. Kravis’s argument that this improperly influenced the jury.

    In Search of Juvenile Justice

    After prison, GWU student pursues second chance

    The Nun-Who Saved a 17 year old convict

    In The Media

    L.A. Times: After 10 Years, a Taste of Freedom

    Above The Law: Unbillable Hours: A True Story

    American Lawyer: Life Beyond Big Law

    CNN: The hidden wounds of combat

    CNN: Soldier’s decision: A crime or his duty?

    Movie Trailer: Murder/Injustice- Mario’s Story

    • Home
    • Practice Areas
    • Attorneys
    • About
    • Contact
    • |
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    © Copyright 2018 Kravis, Graham & Zucker, LLP | All rights reserved.